(PC) Gunn v. Stanton Correctional Facility et al, No. 2:2021cv00365 - Document 17 (E.D. Cal. 2021)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 11/11/2021 ADOPTING 16 Findings and Recommendations in full; This action is DISMISSED for failure to prosecute, failure to comply with court orders, and failure to state a claim for the reasons set forth in the 4/16/2021. CASE CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
(PC) Gunn v. Stanton Correctional Facility et al Doc. 17 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 AUMINTRIUS DAMOUR GUNN, 12 13 14 15 16 No. 2:21-cv-00365-KJM-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER STANTON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, et al., Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff, a former state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 19 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 20 Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 21 On September 17, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which 22 were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings 23 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to 24 the findings and recommendations. 25 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 26 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 27 See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the 28 magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court . . . .”). 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by 2 the record and by the proper analysis. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. The findings and recommendations filed September 17, 2021, are adopted in full; 5 2. This action is dismissed for failure to prosecute, failure to comply with court orders, 6 7 8 and failure to state a claim for the reasons set forth in the April 16, 2021 order; and 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. DATED: November 11, 2021. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.