(HC) Franklin v. Hill, No. 2:2021cv00275 - Document 8 (E.D. Cal. 2021)
Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 4/29/2021 RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(HC) Franklin v. Hill Doc. 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DERRICK JAMES FRANKLIN, 12 Petitioner, 13 14 No. 2:21-cv-00275 JAM GGH P v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RICK HILL, Warden, 15 Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus 17 18 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2254. The matter was referred to the United States Magistrate Judge 19 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1) and Local Rule 302(c). On March 3, 2021, the court issued an order dismissing petitioner’s habeas petition with 20 21 leave to amend to state a civil rights claim. ECF No. 7. Petitioner was granted thirty days from the 22 date of service of the court’s March 3, 2021 order to file a complaint for civil rights claims 23 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Id. Petitioner was warned that “[f]ailure to file an amended 24 complaint in accordance with this order will result in a recommendation that the petition be 25 dismissed without leave to amend.” Id. at 6. Petitioner has not responded to the court’s orders, nor 26 taken any action to prosecute this case. 27 //// 28 //// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed, without 2 prejudice, for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the court’s order. See Fed. R. 3 Civ. P. 41(b); Local Rule 110. 4 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 5 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 6 after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 7 objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s 8 Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the objections shall be filed and served within 9 fourteen days after service of the objections. The parties are advised that failure to file objections 10 within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. 11 Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 12 Dated: April 29, 2021 13 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
