(PC) Edwards v. Kuersten, No. 2:2021cv00259 - Document 10 (E.D. Cal. 2021)
Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 4/26/2021; ADOPTING 6 The Findings and Recommendations in full; DENYING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Edwards v. Kuersten Doc. 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAVID E. EDWARDS, 12 No. 2:21-cv-0259-JAM-EFB P Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 M. KUERSTEN, 15 ORDER Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On March 9, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 21 were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings 22 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to 23 the findings and recommendations.1 24 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 27 28 1 Plaintiff paid the filing fee in full on March 22, 2021. 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 1. The findings and recommendations filed March 9, 2021, are adopted in full; and 2 2. Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) is denied. 3 4 5 6 DATED: April 26, 2021 /s/ John A. Mendez THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
