(PC) Williams-Mootry v. Benbrook et al, No. 2:2021cv00229 - Document 11 (E.D. Cal. 2021)

Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 7/7/2021 ADOPTING 10 Findings and Recommendations filed 5/19/2021 in full; DENYING 4 Motion to Proceed IFP; and Plaintiff is granted 14 days within which to pay the filing fee for this action. Failure to pay the filing fee within 14 days will result in dismissal. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
(PC) Williams-Mootry v. Benbrook et al Doc. 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 LONNIE MO’NIQUE WILLIAMS MOOTRY, Plaintiff, 13 ORDER v. 14 15 No. 2:21-cv-00229-TLN-CKD JOSHUA DAVID BENBROOK, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Lonnie Mo’Nique Williams Mootry (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro 17 18 se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was 19 referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 20 302. On May 19, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 21 22 were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings 23 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 10.) Plaintiff has not filed 24 objections to the findings and recommendations. The Court has reviewed the file under the applicable legal standards and finds the findings 25 26 and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 27 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 28 /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 1. The Findings and Recommendations filed May 19, 2021 (ECF No. 10), are ADOPTED IN FULL; 3 2. Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (ECF No. 4) is DENIED; and 4 3. Plaintiff is granted 14 days within which to pay the filing fee for this action. Failure to 5 6 7 pay the filing fee within 14 days will result in dismissal. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATE: July 7, 2021 8 9 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.