(HC) Camargo v. Unknown, No. 2:2021cv00192 - Document 8 (E.D. Cal. 2021)

Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 7/29/2021 ADOPTING 7 Findings and Recommendations in full, and DISMISSING 1 Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus for petitioner's failure to prosecute and failure to comply with court orders. The court DECLINES to issue the certificate of appealability. CASE CLOSED. (Huang, H)

Download PDF
(HC) Camargo v. Unknown Doc. 8 Case 2:21-cv-00192-JAM-DB Document 8 Filed 07/30/21 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ADRIAN MADRIGAL CAMARGO, 12 Petitioner, 13 14 No. 2:21-cv-0192 JAM DB P v. ORDER UNKNOWN, 15 Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas 17 18 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 19 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On June 1, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 20 21 were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. Petitioner has not filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed June 1, 2021, are adopted in full; 27 28 //// 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:21-cv-00192-JAM-DB Document 8 Filed 07/30/21 Page 2 of 2 1 2 2. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is dismissed for petitioner’s failure to prosecute and failure to comply with court orders. See E.D. Cal. R. 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41. 3 4 3. The court declines to issue the certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. § 2253. 5 6 7 8 DATED: July 29, 2021 /s/ John A. Mendez THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.