(PC) Allen v. Haris, No. 2:2020cv02396 - Document 12 (E.D. Cal. 2021)
Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 7/21/2021 ORDERING Clerk to randomly assign a District Judge to this case and RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed and Clerk be directed to close the case. Assigned and referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Allen v. Haris Doc. 12 Case 2:20-cv-02396-KJM-JDP Document 12 Filed 07/22/21 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TELLY ALLEN, 12 13 14 15 16 Case No. 2:20-cv-02396-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS THAT THIS ACTION BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE, FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH COURT ORDERS, AND FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Defendant. OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN DAYS v. HARIS, 17 18 On February 3, 2021, I screened plaintiff’s complaint, notified him that the complaint 19 failed to state a claim, and granted him sixty days to file an amended complaint. ECF No. 7. 20 Plaintiff failed to timely file an amended complaint. Accordingly, on April 26, 2021, I ordered 21 him to show cause within twenty-one days why this action should not be dismissed for failure to 22 prosecute and failure to state a claim. ECF No. 10. I notified him that if he wished to continue 23 with this lawsuit, he must file an amended complaint. I also warned him that failure to comply 24 with the April 26 order would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. 25 The deadline has passed, and plaintiff has neither filed an amended complaint nor 26 otherwise responded to the April 26, 2021 order. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the 27 Clerk of Court shall randomly assign a United States District Judge to this case. 28 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:20-cv-02396-KJM-JDP Document 12 Filed 07/22/21 Page 2 of 2 1 Further, it is RECOMMENDED that: 2 1. This action be dismissed for failure to prosecute, failure to comply with court orders, 3 and failure to state a claim for the reasons set forth in the February 3, 2021 order, see ECF No. 7; 4 and 5 2. the Clerk of Court be directed to close the case. 6 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 7 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 8 after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 9 objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 10 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 11 objections shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 12 parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 13 appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez 14 v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 15 16 IT IS SO ORDERED. 17 Dated: 18 19 July 21, 2021 JEREMY D. PETERSON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
