(HC) Hinzman v. Eaton, No. 2:2020cv02280 - Document 6 (E.D. Cal. 2021)
Court Description: ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 3/12/2021 ORDERING the Clerk to randomly assign a District Judge to this action and RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed, without prejudice, for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the court's order. Assigned and referred to Judge William B. Shubb; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(HC) Hinzman v. Eaton Doc. 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 STEVEN GENE HINZMAN, Jr., 12 Petitioner, 13 14 No. 2:20-cv-02280 GGH P v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS P. EATON, Warden, 15 Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus 17 18 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2254. The matter was referred to the United States Magistrate Judge 19 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1) and Local Rule 302(c). 20 On December 7, 2020, the court granted petitioner thirty days to file an amended habeas 21 petition in compliance with the court’s instructions. ECF No. 4. On January 27, 2021, the court 22 issued an order to show cause ordering petitioner to show cause within 14 days, why this matter 23 should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and/or to follow a court order pursuant to Federal 24 Rules of Civil Procedure 41(b). ECF No. 5. Petitioner was further informed that the filing of an 25 //// 26 //// 27 //// 28 //// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 amended petition within the timeframe would serve as cause and would discharge the January 27, 2 2021 order. Id. Petitioner has not responded to the court’s orders, nor taken any action to 3 prosecute this case. 4 5 6 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to randomly assign a District Judge to this action. Further, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed, without 7 prejudice, for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the court’s order. See Fed. R. 8 Civ. P. 41(b); Local Rule 110. 9 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 10 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 11 after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 12 objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s 13 Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the objections shall be filed and served within 14 fourteen days after service of the objections. The parties are advised that failure to file objections 15 within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. 16 Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 17 Dated: March 12, 2021 18 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
