(PS) Madariaga et al v. Freedom Mortgage & Trustee Corps, No. 2:2020cv02141 - Document 17 (E.D. Cal. 2021)

Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 4/26/2021 ADOPTING 14 Findings and Recommendations in full. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the Court's order. CASE CLOSED. (Zignago, K.)
Download PDF
(PS) Madariaga et al v. Freedom Mortgage & Trustee Corps Doc. 17 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 SEILA MADARIAGA and CHRISTINA MADARIAGA, Plaintiffs, 13 14 15 16 No. 2:20-cv-02141-TLN-AC ORDER v. FREEDOM MORTGAGE & TRUSTEE CORPS, Defendant. 17 18 Plaintiffs Seila Madariaga and Christina Madariaga (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) are 19 proceeding in this action pro se. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge 20 pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). 21 On January 13, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 22 which were served on Plaintiffs and which contained notice to that any objections to the findings 23 and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. (ECF No. 14.) Plaintiffs have not 24 filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 25 Although it appears from the file that Plaintiffs’ copy of the findings and 26 recommendations was returned, Plaintiffs were properly served. It is Plaintiffs’ responsibility to 27 keep the Court apprised of their current addresses at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), 28 service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. E.D. Cal. L.R. 182(f). 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 2 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 3 See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). 4 The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 5 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 6 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 7 1. The Findings and Recommendations filed January 13, 2021 (ECF No. 14), are 8 9 10 11 12 ADOPTED IN FULL; and 2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the Court’s order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); E.D. Cal. L.R. 110. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: April 26, 2021 13 14 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2