(PC) Taylor v. Solano County Public Defenders Office et al, No. 2:2020cv02114 - Document 14 (E.D. Cal. 2021)
Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 7/14/2021 ADOPTING in FULL 13 Findings and Recommendations. This action is DISMISSED for failure to prosecute, failure to comply with Court orders, and failure to state a claim for the reasons set forth in the 12/28/2020 Order 10 . The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. CASE CLOSED (Reader, L)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Taylor v. Solano County Public Defenders Office et al Doc. 14 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BRANDON LA’SHAUN TAYLOR, 12 13 14 15 16 No. 2:20-cv-02114-TLN-JDP Plaintiff, ORDER v. SOLANO COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER’S OFFICE, et al., Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff Brandon La’shaun Taylor (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has 19 filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a 20 United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 21 On April 26, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 22 were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings 23 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 13.) Plaintiff has not filed 24 objections to the findings and recommendations. 25 Although it appears from the file that Plaintiff’s copy of the findings and 26 recommendations was returned, Plaintiff was properly served. It is Plaintiff’s responsibility to 27 keep the Court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service 28 of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. E.D. Cal. L.R. 128(f). 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 The Court has reviewed the file under the applicable legal standards and finds the findings 2 and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 5 6 1. The Findings and Recommendations filed April 26, 2021 (ECF No. 13), are ADOPTED IN FULL; and 2. This action is DISMISSED for failure to prosecute, failure to comply with Court 7 orders, and failure to state a claim for the reasons set forth in the December 28, 2020 Order (ECF 8 No. 10). 9 10 11 The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: July 14, 2021 12 13 14 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
