(PC) Uhuru v. Mancusi et al, No. 2:2020cv02088 - Document 17 (E.D. Cal. 2021)
Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/12/2021 RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Yin, K)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Uhuru v. Mancusi et al Doc. 17 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KOHEN DIALLO UHURU, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:20-cv-2088 KJM KJN P v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CHERYLINE MANCUSI, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 By an order filed September 28, 2021, plaintiff was ordered to pay, within thirty days, the 17 18 $402.00 filing fee. (ECF No. 16.) Such order adopted the June 25, 2021 findings and 19 recommendations that cautioned plaintiff that his failure to pay the filing fee would result in a 20 recommendation that this action be dismissed. (ECF No. 14 at 6.) Thirty days have now passed, 21 and plaintiff has not paid the court’s filing fee, or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Indeed, on October 6, 2021, plaintiff’s copy of the September 28, 2021 order was 22 23 returned, marked “undeliverable, return to sender, refused.” Id. Despite such return, plaintiff was 24 properly served. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of the 25 party is fully effective. In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be 26 27 dismissed without prejudice. 28 //// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 2 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 3 after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 4 objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 5 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 6 objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 7 parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 8 appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 9 Dated: November 12, 2021 10 11 /uhur2088.fpf 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
