(PC) Lake v. Diaz et al, No. 2:2020cv02077 - Document 13 (E.D. Cal. 2021)
Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 4/26/2021 ADOPTING in FULL 11 Findings and Recommendations, and DENYING 8 Motion for Injunctive Relief. (Reader, L)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Lake v. Diaz et al Doc. 13 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOHN LAKE, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:20-cv-2077 JAM DB P v. ORDER RALPH DIAZ, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On January 19, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 21 which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. (ECF No. 11.) Plaintiff has 23 not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 26 //// 27 //// 28 //// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed January 19, 2021, are adopted in full; and 3 2. Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief (ECF No. 8) is denied. 4 5 6 7 DATED: April 26, 2021 /s/ John A. Mendez THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
