(PC) Gleason v. Lynch et al, No. 2:2020cv01971 - Document 18 (E.D. Cal. 2021)

Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 4/13/2021 ADOPTING 17 Findings and Recommendations in full, DISMISSING 12 First Amended Complaint without further leave to amend. CASE CLOSED. (Coll, A)

Download PDF
(PC) Gleason v. Lynch et al Doc. 18 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 STANLEY GLEASON, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:20-cv-01971-TLN-EFB Plaintiff, ORDER v. JEFF LYNCH, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Stanley Gleason (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this 18 civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United 19 States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On February 18, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 17.) Plaintiff has 23 not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 25 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 26 See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). 27 28 The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The Findings and Recommendations filed February 18, 2021 (ECF No. 17), are 3 4 5 ADOPTED IN FULL; 2. The First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 12) is DISMISSED without further leave to amend; and 6 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the case. 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 DATED: April 13, 2021 9 10 11 12 13 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.