(PS) Grant v. Martinez et al, No. 2:2020cv01963 - Document 46 (E.D. Cal. 2022)
Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 9/21/22 ADOPTING 44 Findings and Recommendations, DENYING without prejudice 37 Motion to Dismiss and GRANTING [37-2] Request for Limited Discovery. (Kaminski, H)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PS) Grant v. Martinez et al Doc. 46 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARK A. GRANT, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:20-cv-01963-TLN-JDP ORDER v. LUIS MARTINEZ, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 On August 11, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 17 18 which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings 19 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 44.) Defendants filed 20 objections on August 25, 2022, and they have been considered by the Court. (ECF No. 45.) In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 21 22 Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 23 Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 24 analysis. 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The Findings and Recommendations filed August 11, 2022 (ECF No. 44) are 3 ADOPTED in full; 4 2. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 37) is DENIED without prejudice; and 5 3. Defendants’ Request for Limited Discovery (ECF No. 37-2) is GRANTED. 6 DATED: September 21, 2022 7 8 9 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
