(PC) Perryman v. California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation et al, No. 2:2020cv01943 - Document 9 (E.D. Cal. 2020)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 12/18/2020 ADOPTING 8 Findings and Recommendations in full, DISMISSING this action without prejudice for lack of prosecution. CASE CLOSED. (Coll, A)

Download PDF
(PC) Perryman v. California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation et al Doc. 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAVID PERRYMAN, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 No. 2: 20-cv-1943 WBS KJN P v. ORDER CALIFORNIA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 19 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 20 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 21 On November 17, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 22 which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the 23 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed 24 objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 26 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 27 ORDERED that: 28 //// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 1. The findings and recommendations filed November 17, 2020, are adopted in full; and 2 2. This action is dismissed without prejudice for lack of prosecution. 3 Dated: December 18, 2020 4 5 6 /perr1943.800 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.