(PC) Chinsami v. Lozano, No. 2:2020cv01792 - Document 6 (E.D. Cal. 2020)

Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 11/20/2020 ADOPTING 5 Findings and Recommendations in full; DENYING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP; and DIRECTING plaintiff to pay the $400 filing fee within 14 days if he wishes to continue with this case. (Coll, A)

Download PDF
(PC) Chinsami v. Lozano Doc. 6 Case 2:20-cv-01792-JAM-DB Document 6 Filed 11/23/20 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SHU CHINSAMI, 12 13 14 No. 2:20-cv-1792 JAM DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER JARED LOZANO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On October 6, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. Plaintiff has not filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 27 1. The findings and recommendations filed October 6, 2020, are adopted in full; 28 2. Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) is denied; and 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:20-cv-01792-JAM-DB Document 6 Filed 11/23/20 Page 2 of 2 1 3. Within fourteen days of the filed date of this order, plaintiff shall pay the $400 filing 2 fee if he wishes to continue with this case. Plaintiff’s failure to do so will result in dismissal of 3 this action. 4 5 6 DATED: November 20, 2020 /s/ John A. Mendez THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.