(PS)Tanksley v. Department of Motor Vehicle et al, No. 2:2020cv01732 - Document 4 (E.D. Cal. 2020)
Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 12/8/2020 RECOMMENDING that Plaintiff's 1 Complaint be dismissed without prejudice; and The Clerk of Court be directed to close this case. These Findings and Recommendations are referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections to these F&Rs due within fourteen (14) days.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MOODY WOODROW TANKSLEY, 12 13 14 15 16 17 No. 2:20-cv-01732-TLN-CKD PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, et al., Defendants. Plaintiff proceeds pro se. This case was referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 18 section 636(b). On November 10, 2020, the undersigned ordered plaintiff, within fourteen days, 19 either to pay the required filing and administrative fees or submit a completed application and 20 affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 3.) The court further 21 cautioned plaintiff that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be 22 dismissed. The deadline for plaintiff to pay the required fees or submit a completed application to 23 proceed in forma pauperis has passed, and plaintiff failed to comply with the undersigned’s order. 24 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 allows a court to dismiss an action sua sponte for 25 failure to prosecute or for failure to comply with the federal rules or any court order. Fed. R. Civ. 26 P. 41(b). Plaintiff has been given ample opportunity to pay the requisite fees. He has impliedly 27 refused or declined to do so. Thus, this action should be dismissed without prejudice for lack of 28 prosecution. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) (an involuntary dismissal “operates as an adjudication on 1 1 the merits,” unless otherwise specified). 2 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that: 3 1. Plaintiff’s original complaint (ECF No. 1) be DISMISSED without prejudice; and 4 2. The Clerk of Court be directed to close this case. 5 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 6 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen (14) 7 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 8 objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 9 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any reply to the objections 10 shall be served on all parties and filed with the court within fourteen (14) days after service of the 11 objections. Failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the 12 District Court’s order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 13 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 14 Dated: December 8, 2020 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 15 16 17 18 17.1732.dismiss 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
