(HC) Eastman v. Covello, No. 2:2020cv01725 - Document 7 (E.D. Cal. 2020)

Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 12/7/2020 ADOPTING 6 Findings and Recommendations in full, DISMISSING this action without prejudice for failure to file an application to proceed in forma pauperis, or in the alternative, to pay the filing fee. CASE CLOSED. (Coll, A)

Download PDF
(HC) Eastman v. Covello Doc. 7 Case 2:20-cv-01725-TLN-DB Document 7 Filed 12/08/20 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAVID K. EASTMAN, 12 Petitioner, 13 14 15 No. 2:20-cv-01725-TLN-DB ORDER v. PATRICK COVELLO, ACTING WARDEN, Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas 18 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (ECF No. 1.) The matter was referred to a United States 19 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On October 20, 2020, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on Petitioner and which contained notice to Petitioner that any objections to 22 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. (See ECF No. 6 at 2.) 23 Petitioner has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 27 /// 28 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:20-cv-01725-TLN-DB Document 7 Filed 12/08/20 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 1. The findings and recommendations issued October 20, 2020 (ECF No. 6), are ADOPTED in full, and 2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to file an application to 4 proceed in forma pauperis, or in the alternative, to pay the filing fee. 5 DATED: December 7, 2020 6 7 8 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.