(PC) Wynne v. Superior Court of California et al, No. 2:2020cv01669 - Document 4 (E.D. Cal. 2020)

Court Description: ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 12/2/2020 ORDERING the Clerk to randomly assign a district judge to this case and RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Assigned and referred to Judge William B. Shubb; Objections to F&R due within 30 days. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DARRELL RAY WYNNE, 12 13 14 15 16 No. 2:20-cv-1669 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants. 17 18 A recent court order was served on plaintiff’s address of record and returned by the postal 19 service. It appears that plaintiff has failed to comply with Local Rule 183(b), which requires that 20 a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any ad dress change. More than sixty- 21 three days have passed since the court order was returned by the postal service and plaintiff has 22 failed to notify the court of a current address. 23 24 25 26 27 28 Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to randomly assign a district judge to this case; and IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. See E.D. Cal. R. 183(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within thirty days after 1 1 being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with 2 the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and 3 Recommendations.” Any response to the objections shall be filed and served within fourteen 4 days after service of the objections. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the 5 specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 6 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 7 Dated: December 2, 2020 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 DLB:9 DB/prisoner-civil rights/wynn1669.33a 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.