(PC) Slay v. Superior Court of California et al, No. 2:2020cv01591 - Document 9 (E.D. Cal. 2021)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 7/23/2021 ADOPTING in full the findings and recommendations filed 5/27/2021; DISMISSING without prejudice for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders; and the Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close this file. CASE CLOSED. (Becknal, R)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Slay v. Superior Court of California et al Doc. 9 Case 2:20-cv-01591-KJM-DMC Document 9 Filed 07/23/21 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL SLAY, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 No. 2:20-CV-1591-KJM-DMC-P v. ORDER SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFONRIA, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action under 18 19 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 20 Eastern District of California local rules. On May 27, 2021, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations, 21 22 which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections 23 within the time specified therein. No objections to the findings and recommendations have been 24 filed. 25 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United 26 States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 27 reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations 28 of law by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:20-cv-01591-KJM-DMC Document 9 Filed 07/23/21 Page 2 of 2 1 court . . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be 2 supported by the record and by the proper analysis. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. The findings and recommendations filed May 27, 2021, are adopted in full; 5 2. This action is dismissed without prejudice for lack of prosecution and 6 7 8 failure to comply with court rules and orders; and 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close this file. DATED: July 23, 2021. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
