(PC) Brooks v. Covello, No. 2:2020cv01573 - Document 27 (E.D. Cal. 2021)

Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 8/9/2021 ADOPTING in FULL 26 Findings and Recommendations, and DENYING 22 Motion for Injunctive Relief. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
(PC) Brooks v. Covello Doc. 27 Case 2:20-cv-01573-WBS-DMC Document 27 Filed 08/10/21 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WILLIE LEE BROOKS, II, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. No. 2:20-CV-1573 WBS DMC P ORDER PATRICK COVELLO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. 18 § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern District of 19 California local rules. 20 On July 21, 2021, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations 21 recommending that Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief (ECF No. 22) be denied. ECF No. 26. 22 The findings and recommendations were served on the Plaintiff and contained notice that he may 23 file objections within the time specified therein. Id. at 7. Plaintiff has not filed any objections to the 24 findings and recommendations. 25 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 26 304(f), this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire 27 file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 28 analysis. 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:20-cv-01573-WBS-DMC Document 27 Filed 08/10/21 Page 2 of 2 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. 3 4 The findings and recommendations filed on July 21, 2021 (ECF No. 26) are adopted in full. 2. Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief (ECF No. 22) is DENIED. 5 6 7 8 9 Dated: August 9, 2021 /s/ John A. Mendez THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.