(PC)Booth v. Newsom, No. 2:2020cv01562 - Document 15 (E.D. Cal. 2020)
Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 12/21/2020 ADOPTING IN FULL 12 Findings and Recommendations and DENYING 9 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. (Tupolo, A)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC)Booth v. Newsom Doc. 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PATRICK BOOTH, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:20-cv-1562 JAM AC P v. ORDER GAVIN NEWSOM, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On November 17, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 12. Plaintiff 23 has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed November 17, 2020, are adopted in full; and 27 28 //// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 2. Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunctive relief, ECF No. 9, is DENIED without prejudice. 3 4 5 DATED: December 21, 2020 /s/ John A. Mendez THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
