(PC)Brown v. Rio Cosumnes Correctional Center, No. 2:2020cv01369 - Document 26 (E.D. Cal. 2021)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 7/8/2021 ADOPTING in full the findings and recommendations filed 5/14/2021; and DISMISSING this action without prejudice for failure to prosecute. See Local Rule 183(b). CASE CLOSED(Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BRIAN BROWN, 12 13 14 15 16 No. 2: 20-cv-1369 WBS KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER RIO COSUMNES CORRECTIONAL CENTER, et al., Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 19 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 20 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 21 On May 14, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 22 were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 23 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed 24 objections to the findings and recommendations. 25 Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the findings and 26 recommendations was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to 27 keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service 28 of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. 1 1 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 2 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 3 ORDERED that: 4 1. The findings and recommendations filed May 14, 2021, are adopted in full; and 5 2. This action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. See Local Rule 6 183(b). 7 Dated: July 8, 2021 8 9 10 11 12 /brow1369.803 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.