(PC)Hash v. Rallos et al, No. 2:2020cv01272 - Document 43 (E.D. Cal. 2022)

Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 6/15/2022 ADOPTING 42 The Findings and Recommendations in full; 16 Defendants' Motion to Revoke Plaintiff's In Forma Pauperis Status and Dismiss the Complaint is DENIED. 15 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. Within twenty-one days of the service of this order, Defendants shall file an Answer to the Complaint. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
(PC)Hash v. Rallos et al Doc. 43 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LAWRENCE GEORGE HASH, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:20-cv-01272-TLN-AC ORDER v. T. RALLOS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 30, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 21 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 22 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty one days. (ECF No. 42.) 23 Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 1. The Findings and Recommendations filed March 30, 2022 (ECF No. 42), are adopted 27 28 in full; 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 2. Defendants’ Motion to Revoke Plaintiff’s In Forma Pauperis Status and Dismiss the Complaint (ECF No. 16) is DENIED. 3 3. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 15) is DENIED; 4 4. Within twenty-one days of the service of this order, Defendants shall file an Answer to 5 the Complaint. 6 DATE: June 15, 2022 7 8 9 10 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.