(PC) Ruiz v. Reilly et al, No. 2:2020cv01212 - Document 20 (E.D. Cal. 2020)

Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 12/7/2020 ADOPTING IN FULL 15 Findings and Recommendations. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Tupolo, A)

Download PDF
(PC) Ruiz v. Reilly et al Doc. 20 Case 2:20-cv-01212-TLN-CKD Document 20 Filed 12/08/20 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROGELIO MAY RUIZ, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:20-cv-01212-TLN-CKD ORDER v. A. REILLY, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Rogelio May Ruiz (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this 17 18 civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United 19 States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On October 27, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 21 which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 15.) Plaintiff has 23 filed objections to the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 18.) The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 24 25 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 26 See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983); see also 28 27 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 28 /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:20-cv-01212-TLN-CKD Document 20 Filed 12/08/20 Page 2 of 2 1 2 Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. The findings and recommendations filed October 27, 2020 (ECF No. 15), are 5 ADOPTED IN FULL; and 6 2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice. 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 DATED: December 7, 2020 9 10 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.