(PC) Haywood v. California Department of Insurance et al, No. 2:2020cv01122 - Document 25 (E.D. Cal. 2021)

Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 4/13/2021 ADOPTING 23 Findings and Recommendations in full, DISMISSING this action without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Coll, A)

Download PDF
(PC) Haywood v. California Department of Insurance et al Doc. 25 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ERICA D. HAYWOOD, 12 13 14 15 16 17 No. 2:20-cv-01122-TLN-CKD Plaintiff, ORDER v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE, et al., Defendants. Plaintiff Erica D. Haywood (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights 18 action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States 19 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On January 26, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 23.) Plaintiff has 23 not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 25 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 26 See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). 27 28 The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommend ations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The Findings and Recommendations filed January 26, 2021 (ECF No. 23), are 3 ADOPTED IN FULL; and 4 2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 DATED: April 13, 2021 7 8 9 10 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.