(PC)Minter v. Superior Court of California et al, No. 2:2020cv01109 - Document 8 (E.D. Cal. 2021)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 4/20/2021 ADOPTING 7 The Findings and Recommendations in full; This action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute. CASE CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC)Minter v. Superior Court of California et al Doc. 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHAYCE MINTER, 12 13 14 15 16 No. 2:20-cv-1109 WBS AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants. 17 Plaintiff, a county prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking 18 relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge 19 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On March 17, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 7. Plaintiff has 23 not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the findings and 25 recommendations was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to 26 keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service 27 of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. 28 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 2 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 3 ORDERED that: 4 5 1. The findings and recommendations filed March 17, 2021, ECF No. 7, are ADOPTED in full; and 6 2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute. See L.R. 7 183(b). 8 Dated: April 20, 2021 9 10 11 12 13 Mint1109.802 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
