(PC) Ruiz v. Rossi et al, No. 2:2020cv01066 - Document 17 (E.D. Cal. 2021)
Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 4/26/21 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge William B. Shubb. Objections due within 30 days.(Plummer, M)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Ruiz v. Rossi et al Doc. 17 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROGELIO MAY RUIZ, 12 No. 2:20-cv-1066 WBS DB P Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 J. ROSSI, et al., 15 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims his rights were violated in connection with a rules violation report 19 he received in June 2019. On November 2, 2020, the undersigned recommended that plaintiff’s 20 motion to proceed in forma pauperis be denied because plaintiff accrued three strikes under 28 21 U.S.C. § 1915(g) prior to filing the instant action. (ECF No. 9.) By order dated January 4, 2021, 22 the district judge assigned to this action adopted the findings and recommendations and directed 23 plaintiff to pay the filing fee within forty-five days or face dismissal of this case. (ECF No. 12.) 24 Those forty-five days have passed, and plaintiff has not paid the filing fee. 25 26 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 27 These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge 28 Assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within thirty days after 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with 2 the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and 3 Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time 4 may result in a waiver of the right to appeal the district court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 5 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 6 Dated: April 26, 2021 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 DB:12 18 DB/DB Prisoner Inbox/Civil.Rights/R/ruiz1066.f&r.fee 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
