(PC) Ruiz v. Rossi et al, No. 2:2020cv01066 - Document 16 (E.D. Cal. 2021)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 4/15/2021 ADOPTING IN FULL 14 Findings and Recommendations; DENYING 13 Motion for Reconsideration and DENYING 15 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Tupolo, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ----oo0oo---- 11 12 ROGELIO MAY RUIZ, Plaintiff, 13 14 15 No. 2:20-cv-1066 WBS DB v. ORDER J. ROSSI, et al., Defendant. 16 17 ----oo0oo---- 18 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has 19 20 filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 21 1983. 22 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate On March 25, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings 23 24 and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and 25 which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the 26 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen 27 days. 28 recommended that the court deny plaintiff’s request to reconsider (Docket No. 14.) The findings and recommendations 1 1 the denial of his motion to appoint counsel and/or an interpreter 2 and the denial of his motion to proceed in forma pauperis. 3 Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and 4 recommendations, and in the objections once again requests the 5 appointment of counsel and/or an interpreter. 6 (Docket No. 15.) In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 7 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de 8 novo review of this case. 9 file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be Having carefully reviewed the entire 10 supported by the record and by proper analysis, both with respect 11 to the denial of counsel and/or an interpreter and the denial of 12 the request to proceed in forma pauperis. 13 the court will deny plaintiff’s request in his most recent 14 objections for appointment of counsel and/or an interpreter. For the same reasons, 15 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 16 1. 17 2021, are adopted in full; 18 19 The findings and recommendations filed March 25, 2. Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration (Docket No. 13) is denied; 20 3. Plaintiff’s request for appointment of counsel 21 and/or an interpreter (Docket No. 15) is denied. 22 Dated: April 15, 2021 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.