(PC) Haines v. County of Sacramento et al, No. 2:2020cv01011 - Document 17 (E.D. Cal. 2021)
Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 11/29/2021 ADOPTING 16 Findings and Recommendations in full and DISMISSING this action for failure to prosecute, failure to comply with Court orders, and failure to state a claim for the reasons set forth in 14 Order. CASE CLOSED. (Huang, H)
Download PDF
(PC) Haines v. County of Sacramento et al Doc. 17 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARCUS A. HAINES, 12 No. 2:20-cv-01011-TLN-JDP Plaintiff, 13 ORDER v. 14 COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On September 16, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 16.) Plaintiff has 23 not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.1 The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 1 27 28 Although it appears from the file that Plaintiff’s copy of the findings and recommendations was returned, Plaintiff was properly served. It is Plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the Court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed September 16, 2021, (ECF No. 16), are adopted in full; 2. This action is dismissed for failure to prosecute, failure to comply with Court orders, and failure to state a claim for the reasons set forth in the April 2, 2021 order. 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. DATE: November 29, 2021 8 9 10 11 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.