(PC) Bouguerba v. County of Sacramento et al, No. 2:2020cv00957 - Document 9 (E.D. Cal. 2021)

Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 7/29/21 ADOPTING 8 Findings and Recommendations. This action is dismissed without prejudice for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close this file. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
(PC) Bouguerba v. County of Sacramento et al Doc. 9 Case 2:20-cv-00957-JAM-DMC Document 9 Filed 07/30/21 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 YOUSEF BOUGUERBA, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:20-CV-0957-JAM-DMC-P v. ORDER COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action under 42 17 18 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern 19 District of California local rules. On May 27, 2021, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 21 which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections 22 within the time specified therein. No objections to the findings and recommendations have been 23 filed. The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 25 supported by the record and the Magistrate Judge’s analysis. 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:20-cv-00957-JAM-DMC Document 9 Filed 07/30/21 Page 2 of 2 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed May 27, 2021, are adopted in full; 3 2. This action is dismissed without prejudice for lack of prosecution and 4 5 failure to comply with court rules and orders; and 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close this file. 6 7 8 9 DATED: July 29, 2021 /s/ John A. Mendez THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.