(PC) Gittens v. Los Angeles County Superior Court et al, No. 2:2020cv00781 - Document 18 (E.D. Cal. 2020)

Court Description: ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 12/03/20 ORDERING the Clerk of Court randomly assign this matter to a District Court Judge. Also, RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Assigned and referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days.(Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DUANE ANGELO GITTENS 12 13 14 15 16 No. 2:20-cv-00781-CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 17 18 By order filed June 4, 2020, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to 19 file an amended complaint was granted. Following multiple extensions of time, that deadline has 20 now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. 21 22 23 24 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court randomly assign this matter to a district court judge. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 25 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 26 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 27 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 28 with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 1 1 and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 2 time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 3 (9th Cir. 1991). 4 Dated: December 3, 2020 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 12/gitt0781.fta.docx 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.