(HC) Phea v. C. Pfeiffer, No. 2:2020cv00283 - Document 76 (E.D. Cal. 2021)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 11/24/2021 ADOPTING IN FULL 74 Findings and Recommendations and DENYING 73 Petitioner's Amended Motion for Relief from Judgment. (Rodriguez, E)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MALANJE PHEA, 12 Petitioner, 13 14 No. 2:20-cv-00283 WBS GGH P v. ORDER CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, Warden, 15 Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this application for a writ of habeas 17 18 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 19 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On October 22, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 21 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 22 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 74. 23 Petitioner has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. ECF No. 75. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 24 25 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 26 court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 27 analysis. 28 ///// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed October 22, 2021, are adopted in full; and 3 2. Petitioner’s amended motion for relief from judgment (ECF No. 73) is denied. 4 Dated: November 24, 2021 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
