(PS)Thacker v. AT&T Mobility, LLC et al, No. 2:2020cv00255 - Document 48 (E.D. Cal. 2021)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 4/1/2021 ADOPTING in FULL 47 Findings and Recommendations. GRANTED in PART and DENIED in PART 42 motion for leave to file the proposed amended complaint as a Second Amended Complaint. D ENYING leave to join AT&T Phone / U-Verse and AT&T Communications, LLC as additional defendants in this action, and GRANTING leave to join AT&T Mobility, LLC as an additional defendant in this action. The Clerk of Court shall update the docket to ad d "AT&T Mobility, LLC" as a defendant, represented by the same counsel currently reflected for defendant AT&T Corporation. No summons needs to be issued, as AT&T Mobility has already appeared in the case, and this case is REFERRED again to the assigned magistrate judge for further proceedings. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
(PS)Thacker v. AT&T Mobility, LLC et al Doc. 48 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAVID C. THACKER, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:20–cv–0255–KJM–CKD PS ORDER (ECF Nos. 42, 47) v. AT&T CORPORATION, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 On March 9, 2021, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations (ECF 17 18 No. 47), which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the 19 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. No objections were 20 filed. Accordingly, the court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United 21 States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 22 reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 23 1983). 24 The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, 25 concludes it is appropriate to adopt the findings and recommendations in full. Accordingly, IT IS 26 HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 47) are ADOPTED IN FULL; 27 28 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 2. Plaintiff’s motion to amend (ECF No. 42) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, as follows: a. Leave to file the proposed amended complaint as a Second Amended Complaint is DENIED; b. Leave to join AT&T Phone / U-Verse and AT&T Communications, LLC as additional defendants in this action is DENIED; and c. Leave to join AT&T Mobility, LLC as an additional defendant in this action is GRANTED; 9 3. The Clerk of Court shall update the docket to add “AT&T Mobility, LLC” as a defendant, 10 represented by the same counsel currently reflected for defendant AT&T Corporation. No 11 summons needs to be issued, as AT&T Mobility has already appeared in the case; and 12 13 4. This case is referred again to the assigned magistrate judge for further proceedings. DATED: April 1, 2021. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.