(PC) Ruiz v. Woodfill et al, No. 2:2020cv00205 - Document 27 (E.D. Cal. 2020)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 2/15/2020 ADOPTING 25 Findings and Recommendations in full; This Action is DISMISSED without prejudice; and Plaintiffs Motions for appointment of counsel, interpreter, requests to proceed in forma pauperis, and to remove the assigned Magistrate Judge 22 , 24 , 26 are DENIED asmoot. CASE CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
(PC) Ruiz v. Woodfill et al Doc. 27 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROGELIO MAY RUIZ, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:20-cv-0205 KJM AC P v. ORDER D. WOODFILL, et al., 15 Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 17 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided 19 by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On November 3, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which 20 21 were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings 22 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 25. Plaintiff has filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. ECF No. 26. 24 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 25 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, the court finds the 26 findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis. 27 ///// 28 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed November 3, 2020 (ECF No. 25), are adopted 3 in full; 4 2. This action is dismissed without prejudice; and 5 3. Plaintiff’s motions for appointment of counsel, interpreter, requests to proceed in 6 forma pauperis, and to remove the assigned magistrate judge (ECF Nos. 22, 24, 26) are denied as 7 moot. 8 DATED: December 15, 2020. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.