(PC) Hunter v. Rouse, et al., No. 2:2020cv00159 - Document 40 (E.D. Cal. 2021)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 5/19/2021 ADOPTING the findings and recommendations filed 4/30/2021, in full; and DISMISSING this action without prejudice. CASE CLOSED(Becknal, R)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAVID SAMPSON HUNTER, 12 13 14 No. 2:20-cv-0159 WBS DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER ROUSE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a county inmate proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On April 30, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 21 were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings 22 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 37.) Plaintiff has filed a 23 document which the court will construe as objections to the findings and recommendations. (ECF 24 No. 38.) 25 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 26 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 27 court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 28 analysis. 1 1 //// 2 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 3 1. The findings and recommendations filed April 30, 2021, are adopted in full; 4 2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. 5 Dated: May 19, 2021 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 /hunt0159.804(2) 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
