(PS) Mitchell, et al. v. Sun City Lincoln Hills Community Association, No. 2:2020cv00139 - Document 50 (E.D. Cal. 2022)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Senior Judge John A. Mendez on 12/16/2022 ADOPTING 48 The Findings and Recommendations in full. Plaintiffs' 43 Motion to enforce the settlement agreement is DENIED. Defendant's request for reasonable fees incurred in responding to the 47 Motion is GRANTED in the amount of $5,375.00. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
(PS) Mitchell, et al. v. Sun City Lincoln Hills Community Association Doc. 50 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOANNE MITCHELL, et al., 12 Plaintiffs, 13 14 15 No. 2:20-cv-00139 JAM KJN (PS) v. ORDER SUN CITY LINCOLN HILLS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, Defendant. 16 17 This matter was referred to the assigned settlement United States Magistrate Judge. (ECF 18 No. 44.) On November 7, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 19 which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed 20 within fourteen days. No party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 21 22 court has conducted a review of this matter. The court finds the findings and recommendations to 23 be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 24 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 25 1. The findings and recommendations filed November 7, 2022 (ECF No. 48) are adopted in full. 26 2. Plaintiffs’ motion to enforce the settlement agreement (ECF No. 43) is denied. 27 28 //// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 3. Defendant’s request for reasonable fees incurred in responding to the motion (ECF No. 47) is granted in the amount of $5,375.00. 4. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 4 5 6 7 Dated: December 16, 2022 /s/ John A. Mendez THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.