(PC) Williams v. Newsom et al, No. 2:2020cv00100 - Document 13 (E.D. Cal. 2021)

Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 11/22/21 ADOPTING in full 12 Findings and Recommendations and DISMISSING this action without prejudice. CASE CLOSED(Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF

(PC) Williams v. Newsom et al Doc. 13 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 EDWARD WILLIAMS, 12 13 14 No. 2:20-cv-0100 JAM AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER GAVIN NEWSOM, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On October 14, 2021, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 12. As of 23 November 12, 2021, plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 27 28 1. The findings and recommendations issued October 14, 2021 (ECF No. 12), are ADOPTED in full, and 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 3 4 Dated: November 22, 2021 5 /s/ John A. Mendez THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 6 7 8 will0100.800 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.