(HC) Ridley v. Neuschmid, No. 2:2020cv00085 - Document 7 (E.D. Cal. 2020)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 4/17/202 0ADOPTING 6 Findings and Recommendations in full; This action is DISMISSED for failure to comply with a court order, see 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a); FRCP 41(b); L.R. 110; and The court DECLINES to issue the certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. § 2253. CASE CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
(HC) Ridley v. Neuschmid Doc. 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAY JERROME RIDLEY, 12 Petitioner, 13 14 No. 2:20-cv-0085 KJM AC P v. ORDER ROBERT NEUSCHMID, WARDEN, 15 Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas 17 18 corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as 19 provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 23, 2020, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, which 20 21 were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 6. Petitioner has 23 not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 24 25 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed 26 de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law 27 by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court 28 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 . . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be 2 supported by the record and by the proper analysis. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. The findings and recommendations issued March 23, 2020 (ECF No. 6) are 5 6 7 ADOPTED in full; 2. This action is DISMISSED for failure to comply with a court order, see 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a); Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); L.R. 110; and 8 9 10 3. The court DECLINES to issue the certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. § 2253. DATED: April 17, 2020. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.