(PC) Cloud v. Cox et al, No. 2:2019cv02593 - Document 60 (E.D. Cal. 2022)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 05/27/22 ADOPTING 59 Findings and Recommendations in full and DISMISSING this action without prejudice for plaintiff's failure to comply with court orders and the local rules. CASE CLOSED(Licea Chavez, V)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOEL JAMES CLOUD, 12 13 14 No. 2:19-cv-2593 WBS DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER COX, et al,, 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On March 22, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 22 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. Neither party has filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 27 28 1. The findings and recommendations filed March 22, 2022 (ECF No. 59) are adopted in full; and 1 1 2. This action is dismissed without prejudice for plaintiff’s failure to comply with court 2 orders and the local rules. See E.D. Cal. R. 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41. 3 Dated: May 27, 2022 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 DLB:9/clou2593.801(2) 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
