(PS) Bradley v. County of Sacramento Dept. of Human Assistance, No. 2:2019cv02419 - Document 3 (E.D. Cal. 2019)
Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 12/12/19 RECOMMENDING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP be denied and plaintiff be directed to pay the filing fee of $400.00 on an installment schedule, with $50.00 payments. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Benson, A.)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RUBY BRADLEY, 12 13 14 15 16 No. 2:19-cv-02419-MCE-CKD PS Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN ASSISTANCE, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING DENYING IFP REQUEST AND SETTING PAYMENT SCHEDULE Defendants. 17 18 This matter was referred to the undersigned under Local Rule 302(c)(21). Pending before 19 the court is plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 20 (authorizing the commencement of an action “without prepayment of fees or security” by a 21 person that is unable to pay such fees). (ECF No. 2.) 22 23 24 On December 3, 2019, plaintiff, proceeding without counsel, commenced this action and requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF Nos. 1–2.) At present, the filing fee to commence a civil case in this court is $400.00. The court may 25 authorize the commencement of an action “without prepayment of fees or security therefor” by a 26 person that is unable to pay such fees or provide security therefor. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). 27 Plaintiff’s financial declaration indicates she has a monthly income of $3,585.56. (ECF No. 2 at 28 1.) According to the United States Department of Health and Human Services, the poverty 1 1 guideline for a household of 1 person (not in Alaska or Hawaii) is $12,490.00 for 2019. See 2 https://aspe.hhs.gov/poverty-guidelines. Thus, plaintiff’s annual gross household income of 3 $43,026.72 is over 340% of the 2019 poverty guideline. Additionally, although she is still 4 making payments on it, plaintiff owns a car with an approximate value of $10,000.00. (ECF No. 5 2 at 3.) As a result, the court finds that plaintiff does not qualify for a waiver of the $400.00 6 filing fee. 7 Nevertheless, the court is also cognizant that plaintiff has relatively little in the way of 8 post-expenses income, and that a one-time $400 payment may represent a significant strain on her 9 monthly budget. Plaintiff claims monthly expenses totaling $3,393.00. (ECF No. 2 at 4–5.) 10 Plaintiff also states she provides support for her mother. (Id. at 3.) Thus, after plaintiff’s listed 11 expenses are deducted from her net income, she has less than $200.00 remaining in expendable 12 income. 13 To be sure, the court is sympathetic to the fact that plaintiff does not appear to have a 14 large income and plaintiff also has several expenses to contend with. However, numerous 15 litigants in this court have significant monthly expenditures and may have to make difficult 16 choices as to which expenses to incur, which expenses to reduce or eliminate, and how to 17 apportion their income between such expenses and litigating an action in federal court. Such 18 difficulties alone, however, do not amount to indigency. 19 Therefore, the court finds it appropriate to instead recommend requiring monthly 20 payments of $50.00 until the $400.00 filing fee is paid in full on the schedule outlined below. 21 The court will further recommend that once plaintiff’s first payment is made, the court shall direct 22 service of the complaint on the named defendant. 23 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that: 24 1. Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) be denied; 25 2. Plaintiff be directed to pay the filing fee of $400.00 on an installment schedule, with 26 $50.00 payments to the Clerk of Court due on the following deadlines: 27 February 1, 2020 28 March 1, 2020 2 1 April 1, 2020 2 May 1, 2020 3 June 1, 2020 4 July 1, 2020 5 August 1, 2020 6 September 1, 2020 7 8 9 3. Once the first installment payment is made, the court shall direct service of the complaint on the named defendant; and 4. Plaintiff be informed that a failure to timely pay the filing fee, or timely request an 10 extension of time to do so, may result in dismissal of the action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 11 Procedure 41(b). 12 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 13 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 14 after being served with these findings and recommendations, the parties may file written 15 objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 16 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” The parties are advised that 17 failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District 18 Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 19 Dated: December 12, 2019 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 20 21 22 23 24 15 bradley2419.f&r.deny.ifp 25 26 27 28 3
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
