(PC) Banuelos v. Weiss et al, No. 2:2019cv02370 - Document 27 (E.D. Cal. 2020)
Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 7/29/2020 ADOPTING 17 Findings and Recommendations in full, and DISMISSING Plaintiff's claim against defendant Weiss for deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. (Huang, H)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Banuelos v. Weiss et al Doc. 27 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 JAIME BANUELOS, 5 6 7 No. 2:19-cv-2370 JAM DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER R. WEISS, 8 Defendant. 9 10 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 11 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 12 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 13 On May 29, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 14 were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings 15 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to 16 the findings and recommendations. 17 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 18 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 19 ORDERED that: 20 1. The findings and recommendations filed May 29, 2020, are adopted in full; and 21 2. Plaintiff’s claim against defendant Weiss for deliberate indifference to his serious 22 medical needs is dismissed. 23 24 25 26 DATED: July 29, 2020 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ _____ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 27 28 1 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
