(PC) Ruiz v. Stormes et al, No. 2:2019cv02352 - Document 11 (E.D. Cal. 2020)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/20/2020 DENYING plaintiff's 9 request for the appointment of counsel and GRANTING his 9 request for an extension of time. Plaintiff shall file his objections to the findings and recommendations within 30 days. (Yin, K)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Ruiz v. Stormes et al Doc. 11 Case 2:19-cv-02352-TLN-EFB Document 11 Filed 04/20/20 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROGELIO MAY RUIZ, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:19-cv-2352-TLN-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER NITA L. STORMES, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. He requests appointment of counsel as well as an extension of time to file his 19 objections to the April 8, 2020 findings and recommendations. 20 District courts may authorize the appointment of counsel to represent an indigent civil 21 litigant in certain exceptional circumstances. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1); Terrell v. Brewer, 935 22 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir.1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335–36 (9th Cir.1990); 23 Richards v. Harper, 864 F.2d 85, 87 (9th Cir. 1988). In considering whether exceptional 24 circumstances exist, the court must evaluate (1) the plaintiff’s likelihood of success on the merits; 25 and (2) the ability of the plaintiff to articulate her claims pro se in light of the complexity of the 26 legal issues involved. Terrell, 935 F.2d at 1017. The court cannot conclude that plaintiff’s 27 likelihood of success, the complexity of the issues, or the degree of plaintiff’s ability to articulate 28 his claims amount to exceptional circumstances justifying the appointment of counsel at this time. Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:19-cv-02352-TLN-EFB Document 11 Filed 04/20/20 Page 2 of 2 1 2 The court will however, grant plaintiff’s request for an extension of time. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s request for the appointment of 3 counsel (ECF No. 9) is denied and his request for an extension of time (ECF No. 9) is granted. 4 Plaintiff shall file his objections to the findings and recommendations within thirty days from the 5 date of service of this order. 6 DATED: April 20, 2020. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
