Sanz v. City of Vallejo et al, No. 2:2019cv02134 - Document 28 (E.D. Cal. 2023)
Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 07/24/23 ADOPTING 27 Findings and Recommendations in full and DISMISSING 1 Complaint without prejudice. CASE CLOSED(Licea Chavez, V)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Sanz v. City of Vallejo et al Doc. 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL SANZ, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:19-cv-2134 TLN DB v. ORDER CITY OF VALLEJO, et al., 15 Defendants, 16 17 This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge. On May 26, 2023, the 18 19 magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and 20 which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed 21 within fourteen days after service of the findings and recommendations. The time for filing 22 objections has expired, and no party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 23 24 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed May 26, 2023, (ECF No. 27) are ADOPTED 3 4 5 6 IN FULL; 2. Plaintiff’s Complaint filed October 22, 2019 (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice; and 3. This action is closed. 7 Dated: July 24, 2023 8 _____________________________________ 9 10 11 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
