(PS) Bridgeman v. San Joaquin Child Protective Services, No. 2:2019cv02108 - Document 5 (E.D. Cal. 2019)
Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/19/19 RECOMMENDING that this action be Dismissed, without prejudice, for lack of prosecution and for failure to cpmply with the court's order. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 21 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Coll, A)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PS) Bridgeman v. San Joaquin Child Protective Services Doc. 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 REGINNA BRIDGEMAN, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 14 v. No. 2:19-cv-02108 JAM AC PS FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SAN JOAQUIN CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES, Defendant. 15 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. The action was accordingly referred to the 18 undersigned for pretrial matters by E.D. Cal. R. (“Local Rule”) 302(c)(21). On November 1, 19 2019, the court granted plaintiff’s in forma pauperis (“IFP”) application but rejected the 20 complaint, granting plaintiff 30 days to file an amended complaint. ECF No. 3. Plaintiff was 21 cautioned that failure to do so could lead to a recommendation that the action be dismissed. 22 Plaintiff did not file an amended complaint within the time limit. On December 4, 2019, the court 23 issued an order to show cause within 14 days why this case should not be dismissed for failure to 24 prosecute. ECF No. 4. Plaintiff has not responded to the court’s orders, nor taken any action to 25 prosecute this case. 26 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed, without 27 prejudice, for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the court’s order. See Fed. R. 28 Civ. P. 41(b); Local Rule 110. 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 2 assigned to this case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty-one 3 (21) days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written 4 objections with the court. Such document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s 5 Findings and Recommendations.” Local Rule 304(d). Plaintiff is advised that failure to file 6 objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. 7 Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 8 DATED: December 19, 2019 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
