(PC) Bland v. Unknown, No. 2:2019cv02102 - Document 14 (E.D. Cal. 2020)

Court Description: ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 12/9/2020 ORDERING the Clerk to randomly assign a US District Judge to this action and RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed with prejudice in accordance with the settlement agreement in Bland v. Badger, 1:19-cv-0702 DAD EPG. Assigned and referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSHUA BLAND, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:19-cv-2102 CKD P v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS UNKNOWN, 15 Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 17 18 U.S.C. § 1983. On December 5, 2019, plaintiff entered into a settlement agreement in Bland v. 19 Badger (Bland I), 1:19-cv-0702 DAD EPG, that included the dismissal of this case with 20 prejudice. ECF No. 12. Plaintiff then requested that the settlement be rescinded. Bland I, ECF 21 Nos. 36, 37. The request was denied. Bland I, ECF No. 50. Accordingly, the settlement 22 agreement remains valid and it will be recommended that this case be dismissed with prejudice in 23 accordance with the settlement agreement in Bland I. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall randomly 24 25 assign a United States District Judge to this action. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed with prejudice in 26 27 accordance with the settlement agreement in Bland v. Badger, 1:19-cv-0702 DAD EPG. 28 //// 1 1 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 2 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 3 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 4 with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 5 and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 6 time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 7 (9th Cir. 1991). 8 Dated: December 9, 2020 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13:blan2102.dismiss.f&r 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.