(PC) Guidry v. Barr et al, No. 2:2019cv02021 - Document 7 (E.D. Cal. 2020)
Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 4/21/20 ADOPTING 6 Findings and Recommendations and DENYING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice. (Kaminski, H)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Guidry v. Barr et al Doc. 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAVID LOUIS GUIDRY, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. No. 2:19-cv-2021 JAM DB P ORDER WILLIAM BARR, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On March 10, 2020, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 6. Plaintiff has 23 not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 27 28 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 1. The findings and recommendations issued on March 10, 2020, are ADOPTED in full; 2 2. Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) is DENIED as incomplete, 3 4 and 3. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice. 5 6 7 8 DATED: April 21, 2020 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ _____ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
