(PC) Nelson v. City of Sacramento, et al., No. 2:2019cv01841 - Document 7 (E.D. Cal. 2019)
Court Description: ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 11/15/2019 ORDERING the Clerk to randomly assign a district judge to this action and RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed without prejudice. Assigned and referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.; Objections to F&R due by within 14 days. (Yin, K)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Nelson v. City of Sacramento, et al. Doc. 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAMES NELSON, JR., 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:19-cv-1841 AC P v. ORDER and SACRAMENTO COUNTY, et al., 15 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action filed pursuant to 17 18 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is referred to the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge 19 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302(c). On September 25, 2019, this court 20 granted plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis, found on screening that the complaint 21 was not suitable for service, and granted plaintiff leave to file a First Amended Complaint (FAC) 22 within thirty days. See ECF No. 4. Plaintiff was informed that “[f]ailure to timely file a FAC 23 will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without prejudice.” Id. at 7. More 24 than thirty days have passed, but plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise 25 responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall randomly assign a 26 27 district judge to this action. 28 //// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 Further, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 3 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 4 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen (14) 5 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written 6 objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 7 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that 8 failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District 9 Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 10 DATED: November 15, 2019 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
