(PC) Nelson v. City of Sacramento, et al., No. 2:2019cv01841 - Document 13 (E.D. Cal. 2021)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Senior Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 3/17/2021 ADOPTING IN FULL 12 Findings and Recommendations. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute. CASE CLOSED. (Tupolo, A)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAMES NELSON, JR., 12 13 14 No. 2:19-cv-1841 MCE AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER CITY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a county prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking 18 relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge 19 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On February 4, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 12. Plaintiff has 23 not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 27 28 1. The findings and recommendations filed February 4, 2021, ECF No. 12, are ADOPTED in full; 1 1 2 2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute, see L.R. 183(b); and 3 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Dated: March 17, 2021 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
