(PC) Love v. Davis et al, No. 2:2019cv01829 - Document 12 (E.D. Cal. 2021)
Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 5/3/2021 ADOPTING the 11 Findings and Recommendations filed 2/2/2021 11 in full ; and DISMISSING this action without prejudice. (Becknal, R)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Love v. Davis et al Doc. 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANGELO M. LOVE, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:19-cv-01829-TLN-DB Plaintiff, ORDER v. DAVIS, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Angelo M. Love (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this 18 civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United 19 States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On February 2, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. (ECF No. 11.) Plaintiff has 23 not filed any objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The Court has reviewed the file under the applicable legal standards and finds the findings 25 and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 26 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 27 28 1. The Findings and Recommendations filed February 2, 2021 (ECF No. 11), are ADOPTED IN FULL; and 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice. 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 DATED: May 3, 2021 4 5 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
