(PC) McKissick v. Amador County Jail et al, No. 2:2019cv01807 - Document 18 (E.D. Cal. 2020)
Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 3/24/2020 ADOPTING in FULL 17 Findings and Recommendations, and this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. CASE CLOSED(Reader, L)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) McKissick v. Amador County Jail et al Doc. 18 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 ROBERT DANIEL McKISSICK, 5 6 7 No. 2:19-cv-1807 JAM KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AMADOR COUNTY JAIL, et al., 8 Defendants. 9 10 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 11 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 12 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 13 On January 22, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 14 which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the 15 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed 16 objections to the findings and recommendations. 17 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 18 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 19 ORDERED that: 20 1. The findings and recommendations filed January 22, 2020, are adopted in full; and 21 2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 22 23 24 25 DATED: March 24, 2020 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ _____ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 26 27 28 1 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
